2020年10月21日水曜日

治療論 英訳 3

 Although this statement is generally accurate, I consider that in the history of psychoanalysis, some analysts discussed the type (2) in van der Hart’s typing. If we go back to Ferenczi’s seminal paper “Confusion of Tangues” we are convinced that he was one of the first among Freud’s disciples who was impressed by the splitting of consciousness. He did not hide his amazement about the way novel psyche is produced as though it is under the influence of some kind of magic.

Sándor Ferenczi (1949). Confusion of the Tongues Between the Adults and the Child—(The Language of Tenderness and of Passion) International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 30:225-230

We talk a good deal in analysis of regressions into the infantile, but we do not really believe to what great extent we are right; we talk a lot about the splitting of the personality, but do not seem sufficiently to appreciate the depth of these splits. If we keep up our cool, educational attitude even vis-a-vis an opisthotonic patient, we tear to shreds the last thread that connects him to us. The patient gone off into his trance is a child indeed [emphasis added] who no longer reacts to intellectual explanations, only perhaps to maternal friendliness; without it he feels lonely and abandoned in his greatest need, i.e. in the same unbearable situation which at one time led to a splitting of his mind and eventually to his illness;p.227

The same anxiety, however, if it reaches a certain maximum, compels them to subordinate themselves like automata to the will of the aggressor, to divine each one of his desires and to gratify these; completely oblivious of themselves they identify themselves with the aggressor. Through the identification, or let us say, introjection of the aggressor, he disappears as part of the external reality, and becomes intra- instead of extra-psychic;p228

It is more remarkable that in the identification the working of a second mechanism can be observed, a mechanism the existence of which I, for one, have had but little knowledge. I mean the sudden, surprising rise of new faculties after a trauma, like a miracle that occurs upon the wave of a magic wand,' or like that of the fakirs who are said to raise from a tiny seed., before our very eyes, a plant, leaves and flowers. Great need, and more especially mortal anxiety, seem to possess the power to waken up suddenly and to put into operation latent dispositions which, un-cathected, waited in deepest quietude for their development. 229

Eventually it may arrive at a state which-continuing the picture of fragmentation-or re would be justified in calling atomization. One must possess a good deal of optimism not to lose courage when facing such a state, though I hope even here to be able to find threads that can link up the various parts. 229